No physicist has ever "“seen"” an electron. Yet, all physicists believe in the existence of electrons. An intelligent but superstitious man advances this analogy to argue that ‘ghosts’ exist even though no one has '‘seen'’ one. How will you refute his argument?
No physicist has ever visible an atom however there are sensible evidences which prove the presence of electron. Their length is so small, even effective microscopes discover it hard to degree their sizes. But nevertheless its results can be tested On the opposite stop there may be no phenomena which may be defined on the idea of lifestyles of ghosts. Our senses of sight and listening to are very restricted to examine the life of both. So there's no assessment among the 2 given cases.
