With reference to the Chola period explain the following: (c) The three types of village assemblies
In the Chola period, individuals of a village took care of administration through their nonappointive bodies. The Chola inscriptions mention the existence of two kinds of villages metropolises and Brahmadeya Villages. metropolis had its native assembly, consisting of all the male members of the village excluding untouchables. It took care of all aspects of the village administration. The Brahmadeya villages were given by the King to learned Brahmins as an act of grant. They had their assemblies are known as Mahasabhas, which had complete freedom in governance. Uttarameruru inscription of Paratanka – I, offers elaborate info concerning the village administration. The villages enjoyed complete independence within the management of native affairs. Two forms of assemblies existing were, metropolis or Urar (Kuri) and Mahasabha. In keeping with the Uttarameruru inscription, Uttarameruru village was divided into thirty components (Kudumbu). One member from every unit was nonappointive for an amount of 1 year. The representatives of the individuals were nonappointive through a lucky draw (Kuduvalai) system. The system of village conduct talks about how the kings managed to suffice the kingdom with a strict organization of the entire ordinance which is quite impressive for that time.
